Peer Reviewed Article On Laws And Ethics Similarity And Differences Pdf


By Neuporedurch1991
In and pdf
09.05.2021 at 22:37
3 min read
peer reviewed article on laws and ethics similarity and differences pdf

File Name: peer reviewed article on laws and ethics similarity and differences .zip
Size: 18776Kb
Published: 09.05.2021

Guide for Authors

Your Paper Your Way We now differentiate between the requirements for new and revised submissions. You may choose to submit your manuscript as a single Word or PDF file to be used in the refereeing process. Only when your paper is at the revision stage, will you be requested to put your paper in to a 'correct format' for acceptance and provide the items required for the publication of your article.

To find out more, please visit the Preparation section below. Neither the Editors nor the Publisher accept responsibility for the views or statements expressed by authors. Ethics in publishing Please see our information pages on Ethics in publishing and Ethical guidelines for journal publication.

Studies in humans and animals If the work involves the use of human subjects, the author should ensure that the work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki for experiments involving humans. The manuscript should be in line with the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals and aim for the inclusion of representative human populations sex, age and ethnicity as per those recommendations.

The terms sex and gender should be used correctly. The sex of animals must be indicated, and where appropriate, the influence or association of sex on the results of the study. Declaration of interest All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence bias their work.

Authors must disclose any interests in two places: 1. A summary declaration of interest statement in the title page file if double anonymized or the manuscript file if single anonymized. If there are no interests to declare then please state this: 'Declarations of interest: none'. This summary statement will be ultimately published if the article is accepted. Detailed disclosures as part of a separate Declaration of Interest form, which forms part of the journal's official records.

It is important for potential interests to be declared in both places and that the information matches. More information. Submission declaration and verification Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously except in the form of an abstract, a published lecture or academic thesis, see ' Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication ' for more information , that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder.

To verify originality, your article may be checked by the originality detection service Crossref Similarity Check. Preprints Please note that preprints can be shared anywhere at any time, in line with Elsevier's sharing policy.

Sharing your preprints e. Use of inclusive language Inclusive language acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is sensitive to differences, and promotes equal opportunities. Content should make no assumptions about the beliefs or commitments of any reader; contain nothing which might imply that one individual is superior to another on the grounds of age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or health condition; and use inclusive language throughout.

These guidelines are meant as a point of reference to help identify appropriate language but are by no means exhaustive or definitive. Authorship statements should be formatted with the names of authors first and CRediT role s following. More details and an example Changes to authorship Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission.

Any addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should be made only before the manuscript has been accepted and only if approved by the journal Editor.

To request such a change, the Editor must receive the following from the corresponding author : a the reason for the change in author list and b written confirmation e-mail, letter from all authors that they agree with the addition, removal or rearrangement. In the case of addition or removal of authors, this includes confirmation from the author being added or removed. Only in exceptional circumstances will the Editor consider the addition, deletion or rearrangement of authors after the manuscript has been accepted.

While the Editor considers the request, publication of the manuscript will be suspended. If the manuscript has already been published in an online issue, any requests approved by the Editor will result in a corrigendum. Copyright Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' see more information on this.

An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' form or a link to the online version of this agreement. Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal circulation within their institutions.

Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution outside the institution and for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations. If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author s must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source s in the article.

Elsevier has preprinted forms for use by authors in these cases. Author rights As an author you or your employer or institution have certain rights to reuse your work. Elsevier supports responsible sharing Find out how you can share your research published in Elsevier journals. If the funding source s had no such involvement then this should be stated. Open access Please visit our Open Access page for more information. Language usage and editing services Please write your text in good English American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these.

Authors who feel their English language manuscript may require editing to eliminate possible grammatical or spelling errors and to conform to correct scientific English may wish to use the English Language Editing service available from Elsevier's Author Services. Submission Our online submission system guides you stepwise through the process of entering your article details and uploading your files.

The system converts your article files to a single PDF file used in the peer-review process. Editable files e. All correspondence, including notification of the Editor's decision and requests for revision, is sent by e-mail. These should not exceed the word count provided below. Figures and figure captions are not considered in the word count. Multiple study research articles: Research articles reporting multiple two or more studies should not exceed 10, words in total.

Brief Reports: These articles should not exceed a total of 2, words including tables, figures, and references. Additional tables or figures can be included in Supplementary Material. Correspondence Section. Technical Comments. These comment on a paper published recently in PAID normally in the last 12 months.

Titles must be "Technical comment on reference of original paper in APA format ". They should be no longer than words plus an abstract. Comments should focus on substantive methodological or statistical issues. Nor should they cover the same ground as previous commentators. Authors of technical comments should show their contribution to the corresponding author of the paper before submitting their manuscript, and should seek their feedback. This correspondence in English should be submitted alongside the main text to facilitate the review process; it will not be published.

These highlight recent exciting research from PAID or other journals, but do not primarily discuss the author's own work. They should be up to words long plus abstract and may provide context for the findings within a field, integrate the findings from several papers, or draw readers' attention to work in other areas which may have implications for individual differences.

They should add a dimension to the research and not merely summarise other work. The system automatically converts your files to a single PDF file, which is used in the peer-review process.

As part of the Your Paper Your Way service, you may choose to submit your manuscript as a single file to be used in the refereeing process. This can be a PDF file or a Word document, in any format or lay-out that can be used by referees to evaluate your manuscript. It should contain high enough quality figures for refereeing.

If you prefer to do so, you may still provide all or some of the source files at the initial submission. Please note that individual figure files larger than 10 MB must be uploaded separately. Reporting Requirements: All empirical submissions are required to: a provide sufficient detail on the samples studied and the population from which they constitute a random or convenience sample; b compile basic descriptive statistics of all variables of relevance used in the study e.

References There are no strict requirements on reference formatting at submission. References can be in any style or format as long as the style is consistent.

Use of DOI is highly encouraged. The reference style used by the journal will be applied to the accepted article by Elsevier at the proof stage. Note that missing data will be highlighted at proof stage for the author to correct.

Formatting requirements There are no strict formatting requirements but all manuscripts must contain the essential elements needed to convey your manuscript, for example Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions.

Divide the article into clearly defined sections. Figures and tables embedded in text Please ensure the figures and the tables included in the single file are placed next to the relevant text in the manuscript, rather than at the bottom or the top of the file. The corresponding caption should be placed directly below the figure or table.

Peer review This journal operates a double blind review process. All contributions will be initially assessed by the Editor-in-Chief for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent onto a Senior Associate Editor for assessment and then to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The handling editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles, and the editor's decision is final.

Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible. Most formatting codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. The electronic text should be prepared in a way very similar to that of conventional manuscripts see also the Guide to Publishing with Elsevier. See also the section on Electronic artwork. To avoid unnecessary errors you are strongly advised to use the 'spell-check' and 'grammar-check' functions of your word processor.

Article structure Subdivision - numbered sections Divide your article into clearly defined and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered 1. Use this numbering also for internal cross-referencing: do not just refer to 'the text'. Any subsection may be given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its own separate line. Introduction State the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background, avoiding a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results.

Material and methods Provide sufficient details to allow the work to be reproduced by an independent researcher. Methods that are already published should be summarized, and indicated by a reference.

Scientific misconduct

Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the publication of professional scientific research. The consequences of scientific misconduct can be damaging for perpetrators and journal audience [3] [4] and for any individual who exposes it. Three percent of the 3, research institutions that report to the US Department of Health and Human Services ' Office of Research Integrity , indicate some form of scientific misconduct. They routinely monitor such research publication for red flags and their investigation is subject to a statute of limitations. The validity of the methods and results of scientific papers are often scrutinized in journal clubs.

Business Ethics Pdf Managing Business Ethics is the perfect text to prepare students for a range of roles in the business world—managers across business functions, communications professionals, compliance officers, corporate counsels, human resources managers, and senior executives. Download Free PDF. Press room. A common view of the firm holds that employees, customers, shareholders, and suppliers are Customers do evaluate the ethical practices of companies, and research in marketing ethics has shown that some customers are aware of the. E-mail: UR Courses email. Ethics and Negotiation: 5 Principles of Negotiation to Boost Your Bargaining Skills in Business Situations How to use the principles behind negotiation ethics to create win-win agreements for you and your bargaining counterpart.

Guide for Authors

Now, you can steer to another track, but on that track is one person who you will kill instead of the five. What do you do? As the show points out, people who study ethics, like me and Chidi, love to think about hypothetical situations but can be totally unprepared to make ethical choices in practice. So why do people continue studying ethics?

What’s the Matter with Business Ethics?

With the recent boom in business ethics comes a curious irony: the more entrenched the discipline becomes in business schools, the more bewildering—and even off-putting—it appears to actual managers.

Business Ethics Pdf 2016

A proposal to encourage the preregistration of research on research integrity was developed and adopted as the Amsterdam Agenda at the 5th World Conference on Research Integrity Amsterdam, This paper r Authors: Klaas Sijtsma, Wilco H. Emons, Nicholas H. Steneck and Lex M. Citation: Research Integrity and Peer Review 6 Content type: Research.

Your Paper Your Way We now differentiate between the requirements for new and revised submissions. You may choose to submit your manuscript as a single Word or PDF file to be used in the refereeing process. Only when your paper is at the revision stage, will you be requested to put your paper in to a 'correct format' for acceptance and provide the items required for the publication of your article. To find out more, please visit the Preparation section below.

Knowing the difference and relationship between them is important though, because they can conflict with one another. If the law conflicts with our personal values or a moral system, we have to act — but to do so we need to be able to tell the difference between them. They serve as a reference point for all the possible courses of action we could choose. On this definition, an ethical decision is one made based on reflection about the things we think are important and that is consistent with those beliefs. Many people find morality extremely useful. Not everyone has the time and training to reflect on the kind of life they want to live, considering all the different combinations of values, principles, and purposes.

The Myopia of Moral Philosophy

People often assume that moral and religious convictions are functionally the same thing. But are they? Meta-analytic tests of each of these hypotheses yielded weak support for the secularization hypothesis, no support for the equivalence or political asymmetry hypotheses, and the strongest support for the distinct constructs hypothesis. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

 Багаж, сеньор.

 - Он откусил кусок пирога и заговорил с набитым ртом.  - Максимальное время, которое ТРАНСТЕКСТ когда-либо тратил на один файл, составляет три часа. Это включая диагностику, проверку памяти и все прочее. Единственное, что могло бы вызвать зацикливание протяженностью в восемнадцать часов, - это вирус. Больше нечему.

4 Comments

Feidisliper
10.05.2021 at 20:41 - Reply

Contact Monica Mungle for help if edits are needed to the top section.

Maria139
11.05.2021 at 11:17 - Reply

The similarities and differences between ethics, morality and law is complex and Sociological jurisprudence was first defined in in a law review article by.

Fisynsosi
13.05.2021 at 05:04 - Reply

An international journal for the rapid publication of novel reports on a range of aspects of toxicology, especially mechanisms of toxicity.

Kari G.
15.05.2021 at 23:58 - Reply

Why i left goldman sachs a wall street story pdf download programming with posix threads by david r. butenhof pdf

Leave a Reply